use case implementation page

AI Performance Support Tools for People Managers

Managers often own performance conversations without enough guidance. This use case focuses on practical, in-the-flow support tools. Use this page to align stakeholder goals, pilot the right tools, and operationalize delivery.

Buyer checklist before vendor shortlist

  • Keep the pilot scope narrow: one workflow and one accountable owner.
  • Score options with four criteria: workflow-fit, governance, localization, implementation difficulty.
  • Use the same source asset and reviewer workflow across all options.
  • Record reviewer effort and update turnaround before final ranking.
  • Use the editorial methodology as your scoring standard.

Recommended tools to evaluate

AI ImagePaid

Midjourney

AI image generation via Discord with artistic, high-quality outputs.

AI VideoPaid

Synthesia

AI avatar videos for corporate training and communications.

AI ProductivityPaid

Notion AI

AI writing assistant embedded in Notion workspace.

AI WritingPaid

Jasper

AI content platform for marketing copy, blogs, and brand voice.

AI WritingFreemium

Copy.ai

AI copywriting tool for marketing, sales, and social content.

AI VideoFreemium

Runway

AI video generation and editing platform with motion brush and Gen-3.

Manager Performance Support System

  1. Identify recurring manager moments: feedback, delegation, coaching.
  2. Generate structured conversation guides and prompts.
  3. Embed support into weekly 1:1 and review routines.
  4. Track behavior change and team outcomes over time.

Example: A people ops team used AI coaching prompts to improve consistency in manager feedback conversations.

Implementation checklist for L&D teams

  • Define baseline KPIs before tool trials (cycle time, completion, quality score, or ramp speed).
  • Assign one accountable owner for prompts, templates, and governance approvals.
  • Document review standards so AI-assisted content stays consistent and audit-safe.
  • Link every module to a business workflow, not just a content topic.
  • Plan monthly refresh cycles to avoid stale training assets.

Common implementation pitfalls

  • Running pilots without a baseline, then claiming gains without evidence.
  • Splitting ownership across too many stakeholders and slowing approvals.
  • Scaling output before QA standards and version controls are stable.

Internal planning links

Related planning routes

FAQ

Does this replace manager training?

No. It reinforces it by giving in-the-moment execution support.

What proves value fastest?

Look for improved quality of 1:1s, clearer goals, and better team feedback signals.

How do we keep quality high while scaling output?

Use standard templates, assign clear approvers, and require a lightweight QA pass before each publish cycle.